New publication in the "Journal of Retailing"

”A Comparison of Product Return Rate Calculation Methods: Evidence from 16 Retailers"

The marketing department is delighted to report about the following publication in the "Journal of Retailing":

El Kihal, Siham / Nurullayev, Namig / Schulze, Christian / Skiera, Bernd (2020), ”A Comparison of Product Return Rate Calculation Methods: Evidence from 16 Retailers”, Journal of Retailing, forthcoming

Congratulations to the authors!


 

Abstract

The product return rate (RR) is an important metric for retailers; even small RR changes can significantly impact retailers’ profit. Companies and researchers typically favor and employ one of three methods to calculate the RR: based on the number of returned items, these items’ revenue, or their profit contribution. Interviews with 24 managers and industry experts reveal that two methods, item-based and revenue-based, are often used.However, little is known about how much the interpretation of RRs depends on the calculation method. In this article, the authors rely on extensive datasets to investigate these potential differences empirically. Analyzing more than 8 million transactions at sixteen different retailers, the authors find that RRs calculated via the three methods differ on average by 24.3%. The size of these differences makes cross-sectional comparisons of RRs calculated via different methods difficult. In contrast, the authors find that the developments of the RRs over time are similar, which allows for a meaningful time-series comparison of RR developments, regardless of the method. Finally, this research shows that all three calculation methods result in RRs that are equally insightful (leading) indicators of relevant retailer performance metrics.

 

 

Top